Equality and transparency are essential In The Country Today, Carmen Morán makes a look at what this paper considers one of the unfinished business of the 22-M (and both!) And entitled Unit half. You can view information by clicking here
And is that according to its storyline " is not easy for either of the two major parties put together a general discourse on the Law Dependency to serve all communities What can they say the popular in Madrid or Valencia? What explains the Socialists in the Balearics? To view as inequitable, the PP uses the 'effort made by each community to develop a law underfunded by central government. " And the PSOE remember that this law 'is one of the great achievements in the field of social rights in this term, which would not exist if they had ruled the popular'. Vale. But for a general election. Not heard, however large the popular attacks on the Government of Castilla-La Mancha with the gun of dependence. Neither star is the issue of the Socialist opposition in La Rioja, because in both territories approved with a note in their management with the employees. "
Something like what happens with corruption. Since both PP and PSOE have things to be quiet, often obviate the debate, it does not exist. Others hide behind the "and you, more" So during the last debate in Telemadrid (the only one to be held, what more imperfect democracy we) did not devote even a second to corruption. As if there were no ... Gürtel
The finger on it in as always, José Manuel Ramírez, President of the State Association of Directors and Managers of Social Services : " It is worrying that one-third of the English population live in communities where there is no will or ability to implement this system, a right which must be equal for all . And it is unacceptable to turn something as sensitive, such as most basic needs of daily life of people in a dependent and their families in an area for political confrontation And as we have reiterated on this blog the great problem of the Unit, and as many other things in English politics is equality. It is unacceptable that a country's citizens have such different rights depending on their place of residence. Especially when it comes to basic services such as Health, Education or Social Services. And remember that in this case responsibility to ensure equality is the national government. is a scandal that is not done well, especially when the ruler is the Socialist Party. But this is what we have ...
We have asked hundreds of times, why Zapatero's government really does not require the CCAA noncompliant law dependency than just met? Why the hesitation to demand that law-abiding CCAA? And cases relates el reportaje dejan bien claro que no es solo un asunto de ideología; se trata más bien de voluntad politica...
Para terminar, Carmen Morán hace una reflexión que comparto en su integridad : “La dependencia, como casi todo, necesita más dinero. Quizá el Gobierno no ponga el suficiente, pero más grave es que en unas comunidades y otras, los gobernantes acuden a estas elecciones sin que se sepa aún cuánto han puesto ellos, obligados como están a cofinanciar esta ley ”. Y es que ese es otro de los grandes problemas españoles: la falta de transparencia. Y eso es aplicable a la procurement, to full of local councils, to know how many positions of trust have a government of the day, etc. We have always valued the sers Im statistics involving a small window while trapping, as well reminds us the report: "shows all the applications are to be enrolled? How many people were already registered before the law? Better that the data are reliable, because the communities get money for it . And because when governments change the miseries appear under the rug. "
Therefore, because we want to uphold equality and ensure transparency, because we have no mortgage, because we are at the right time to change things, I ask for UPyD vote.
